Red Bull and Daimler
Does Daimler know something Red Bull does not?
What can Gangnam Style tell us about viral marketing?
Should an agency that tells you, “We know how to create buzz,” be taken seriously?
Keywords: WOMMA, social media marketing, buzz marketing, viral marketing, Old Spice
CLICK - Register for FREE - CyTRAP BlogRank - TRACK your blogThis blog post provides some ideas to improve your online footprint, and is intended for bloggers, Twitter or Facebook users, and marketers (see also Social Media DOs and DON’Ts).

By the way, want to get trends like this one first? Enter your email address and join over 5,000 followers who already subscribeSign up for our blog – it is FREE!

Word of Mouth

We all know the classic word-of-mouth situation, in which someone passes on information to others. Sometimes it is gossip, other times it is what we have experienced regarding service and so forth. I remember the time I bought a few things at a local store, and broke some glass bottles on my way home after falling off my bike. The owner helped me up andgave me a free replacement. Did I talk about this? You better believe it – he saved my day!

All of us know about such experiences, but these days, marketing tools offer new ways to try to spread the word. Figure 1 below outlines how these important concepts can be used.

CLICK - Word of Mouth - is your blog content going viral?

Everybody wants a marketing message go viral, but few do, as we all know. So why do some things go viral and others do not?

Word of Mouth Marketing

In the simplest sense, word-of-mouth marketing is little more than trying to copy the word-of-mouth example I explained above. For instance, whenever we like a company’s page, our friends are told about this on the right side of their screen. This way Facebook hopes we Like the page as well…

While we hope that our word-of-mouth marketing message goes viral it often just fizzles out. In the Mercedes-Benz video below, people call for a cab and get picked up by a trailer truck. If you can afford the €200,000 to hire VonMatt to script the story and make the video, great. The video started with 20,000 views for the German version, and now the English version has about 700,000 views (German irony, tongue-in-cheek with English subtitles). The question is whether this is a flop. Measure for impact, anyone?

YouTube Preview Image

The key question is whether the Mercedes Benz video helped sell more trucks. Unless it did, we have a video that illustrates word-of-mouth, or even buzz marketing well. Unfortunately, not a successful case of viral marketing.

Buzz Marketing

Videos are often used to create some excitement about a product. These can be ironic, fun or simply jaw-dropping. First came the 30-second television commercial Man, Your Man Could Smell Like, featuring the ironic model of manliness portrayed by Isaiah Mustafa.

YouTube Preview Image

This was amplified with widespread online exposure that prompted a three-day YouTube campaign in which the actor responded to messages from fans (see Social Media Monitoring group on Xing: Old Spice crew produces 87 short comedic YouTube videos).

The above was a successful buzz campaign that went viral (see below) – at least in the US. However, the buzz marketing effort was supported by in-store activities to help move product. This was lacking in the follow-up, with the result being some buzz without any more product getting moved.

Viral Marketing

Gangnam Style is the most-watched YouTube video. Ever. Does Psy know something we do not? Can he invite us to a workshop so we can learn?

CLICK - 5 Tips from the Gangnam Style video

When it works, viral marketing helps spread a message further and much faster than otherwise, in part thanks to social networks like Facebook or LinkedIn. However, the critical part of viral marketing is that the product message is built in. Psy sold more music and is getting more gigs thanks to his viral video.

Bottom line

Three things seem particularly important:

1. We are a buzz marketing agency, we know what we are doing. NOT: Unless you have the budget and brand recognition behind you (it takes a bit of cash to get Goerge Clooney to become your brand ambassador), it is difficult to create buzz.

2. What works in the US could fail anywhere else: For instance, the Old Spice videos were okay for the US, but would they have created much excitement in China? Forget dubbing, the humor would have been a flop. Similarly Baumgartner’s record-breaking jump for Red Bull from outer space was probably of more interest to Austrians than Germans. Why? Who knows, but it is a fact.

3. Why Red Bull, Coca-Cola, Daimler, Nespresso are not the best viral marketeers: As Psy of Gangnam Style fame was the first to admit, viral marketing is a chance game. Sometimes you are lucky and it works. Unless going viral means selling more product, who cares?

Get more ComMetrics content on viral marketing, Google, KPI, ROI and Facebook marketing (just click the URL to get some very interesting results).

More resources

Source: 3 steps to word-of-mouth success

By the way, check out my other books that add insight.


Urs E. Gattiker, Ph.D. - CyTRAP Labs - ComMetrics.

The author: This post was written by social media marketing and strategy expert Urs E. Gattiker, who also writes about issues that connect social media, strategy, ROI and compliance (click Google Scholar or Microsoft Scholar), and thrives on the challenge of measuring how it all affects your bottom line.

His latest book, Social Media Audit: Measure for Impact, was recently published by Springer Science Publishers; he is currently working on his next book, scheduled to appear before the end of the year.

Connect with ComMetrics on Google+ or the author using: Email | Twitter | | Xing


Which book cover should it be?
How it was: Design a book cover and then release it…
Today: Ask my readers for help.
Which do you prefer? Please vote!

Keywords: KPI, marketing, measure for impact, ROI, SocBiz, social business, social media, social media audit, readers

ComMetrics - CyTRAP Labs - participate in our poll - your vote counts - THANK you.
Your opinion matters to me!

Please cast your vote - if you choose Other, please explain in a comment what you would prefer instead. Thank you!

More books by Urs E. Gattiker - latest book on Social Media - Resonance or Impact - which book cover is better - cast your vote!

After you have voted, you can view the results right here:


In the meantime, join our 5,000+ subscribers and sign up for our blog – it is FREE! Get the next blog post first.

Once again, thank you very much for your participation. And as always, I love to hear what you think!

By the way, check out my other books that add insight.

TL:DR | @ComMetrics writes: Choose a book cover: Poll on Twitter, Facebook and Google

Which book cover is better? Please share this poll with your friends and your comments with us below.


Urs E. Gattiker, Ph.D. - CyTRAP Labs - ComMetrics.

The author: This post was written by social media marketing and strategy expert Urs E. Gattiker, who also writes about issues that connect social media, strategy, ROI and complianc (click Google Scholar or else  Microsoft Scholar), and thrives on the challenge of measuring how it all affects your bottom line.

His latest book, Social Media Audit: Measure for Impact, was recently published by Springer Science Publishers; he is currently working on his next book, scheduled to appear before the end of the year.

Connect with ComMetrics on Google+ or the author using: Email | Twitter | | Xing


Ultimate cheat sheet: Google Reader alternatives

by Urs E. Gattiker on 2013/04/14 · 6 comments 1,882 views

in white papers checklists

Which Google Reader alternative are you switching to?
We have tested the best alternatives for your RSS feeds – frind the results here.
Keywords: Apple, Google, RSS, Mozilla, Outlook, productivity, news, email

Image - Oil platform - The Petroleum Safety Authority of Norway (Petroleumstilsynet, PSA) has hit Statoil with strong criticism over its handling of 'a series of incidents' on its Gullfaks C platform in the North Sea, and ordered a string of improvements.In late 2008 I published a post about why RSS fails with my readers, wherein I explained what RSS seems to lack in order to be loved by my blog readers. Things have changed but people still have yet to fall in love with RSS – if they ever will. This is probably one reason why Google Reader is gone. Of course, the other being that Google Reader fails to generate the revenue Google wants.

It is not the end of the world, and there are many great news reading apps and services out there stepping up to replace it. This blog post outlines some steps you can take to shift to another service provider or tool before Google Reader shuts down for good.

In the meantime, join our 5,000+ subscribers and sign up for our blog – it is FREE! Get the next blog post first.

Step 1

According to the official company blog, Google Reader will be turned off on July 1, 2013, because usage has declined over the years.

We launched Google Reader in 2005 in an effort to make it easy for people to discover and keep tabs on their favorite websites. While the product has a loyal following, over the years usage has declined. So, on July 1, 2013, we will retire Google Reader. Users and developers interested in RSS alternatives can export their data, including their subscriptions, with Google Takeout over the course of the next four months.

So the first order of business is exporting your feed list using Google Takeout, which will not only get you your list of subscriptions in xml format, but also other related data.

See also: Has Google got its priorities right on closing Reader?

Step 2

Before you can decide what best suits your needs, you must determine your preferred method:

1. reading online (i.e. accessed on an Internet site – often offer apps as well),
2. reading on your desktop,
3. using your browser to read your favorite RSS feeds (readers read in your browser window/tab),
4. using your email program to collect your readers, such as Microsoft Outlook or Mozilla Thunderbird, or
5. hosting your RSS reader on your server.

CLICK - Google Reader - people discussing what they should do on Google+

Tip sheet: How to manage RSS so it works for you

Step 3

The world’s most popular RSS client is FeedDemon. Unfortunately, it relies on Google Reader for synchronization of RSS feeds, so unless it develops its own backend, FeedDemon may cease to be usable after Google Reader’s shutdown. Nick Bradbury announced the end of FeedDemon, but will release a last version that works without Google Reader:

So here’s what I’m going to do: sometime before the demise of Google Reader, I’ll release a new version of FeedDemon which no longer syncs with Google Reader. This version will be free, won’t contain any ads, and will have all of the features of the Pro version. You can use it free of charge for as long as you like – but it will be the last version of FeedDemon.

So what RSS client should you choose? Here are the five best ones. We have another 100 further below with links to various tools, blog posts and so forth, to give you more options.

Rest assured, these ones work nicely regardless of which device you might use today and tomorrow, so have fun!

Winner: FeedBooster.com

Google Reader does not give users an easy way to search except within a feed and by adding tags.

Web-based feed aggregator Q-Sensei FeedBooster allows you to

- choose between three formats to read your feeds (no ads, mind you!),
- sort feeds alphabetically or by frequency, AND
- sort them by folder, data, tag, author, source, and/or language, plus
- search across RSS feeds with search engine-like operators (e.g., Boolean).

CLICK - FeedBooster - Import your previous feeds as an OPML file or start fresh.

DisadvantagesNone so far.

First runner-up: Feedly.com

This service is browser-based and works easily with Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox or on your mobile. It functions similarly to a cloud service, since feeds are stored online, as well as storing read and saved articles. In turn, you can synchronize it with several devices (i.e. desktop, smartphone, tablet).

Advantages: You can save articles across devices and share them across social media platforms. Of course, it also has iPhone and Android OS apps, as well as browser plug-ins.

Disadvantages: We have yet to see whether its new backend will work properly – it currently uses Google Reader.

Second runner-up: We have a three-way tie!

Microsoft Outlook or Mozilla Thunderbird
The best part is that you can customise the RSS feed, such as picking and choosing categories – build the RSS feed in 10 Seconds – ComMetrics cheat sheet. This is the easy way to get your feeds via your favorite email program and read them online or offline.

Advantages: Your RSS feeds can be filtered and put into folders in your email program, making it easy to search for and find things. Backing up to an external hard-drive at home or at work makes it easy to recover material.

Disadvantages: Not sure… unless you hate email, but it is here to stay (click here for more info). Of course, every newsfeed you can get via email makes your newsreader unnecessary (click here for more info).

OldReader.com
Some have suggested that web-based OldReader is a better reader than Google Reader since it offers a minimalist interface and offers almost the same features as Google Reader. It displays the feeds you subscribe to in a stream of posts or titles. It supports keyboard shortcuts and the like, and social sharing is made easy.

Advantages: Adjusts to the screen size used and a simple how-to tutorial (click here for more info) is easily available.

Disadvantages: No dedicated mobile app, but it still opens easily on a phone using your favorite browser. However, since you cannot upload your Google OPML file, you have to enter your feeds manually. If you have 200+ readers (see above image) this will take time – great opportunity to weed out stuff you do not need!

Feedspot.com
This is another free reader that is easy to set up using one’s email address. Feedspot makes it easy to organize your feeds by moving them into categories and adding and removing feeds and categories.

Advantages: Takes about 5 minutes to set up and import all contacts from various email accounts and Readers.

Disadvantages: The service’s future is unclear (click here for more info).

Exporting your Google Reader subscriptions

1. Go to your Google Reader settings then click on the ‘Import/Export’ tab.
2. Click on ‘Download your data through Takeout’ or ‘Click Here’.
2. Save the XML file.
3. Follow the directions of the new reader into which you want to import your Google Reader subscriptions.

Article sourceUltimate cheat sheet: Google Reader alternatives

Bottom line: More alternatives

There are many alternatives – some cost and some are free. Of course, as Google has shown, when a free service no longer fits the strategy, it gets closed (Google pays US$50 million to close down Aardvark just about 12 months later), leaving your trusty email program, which can be synchronized via different devices you use and is free. Email will likely be with us for a while (see also Why RSS readers fail with my readers and clients).

 Sign up for our emailed blog posts

What is your take?

I love to get your advice and opinions!

Do you use Google Reader?
What alternative have you chosen?
Have you had any trouble transferring your feeds to the new program?
Does synchronising your feeds across devices work with your new RSS reader?

Please let me know in the comments!


Urs E. Gattiker, Ph.D. - CyTRAP Labs - ComMetrics.

The author: This post was written by social media marketing and strategy expert Urs E. Gattiker, who also writes about issues that connect social media, strategy, ROI and compliance (click Google Scholar), and thrives on the challenge of measuring how it all affects your bottom line.

His latest book, Social Media Audit: Measure for Impact, was recently published by Springer Science Publishers; he is currently working on his next book, scheduled to appear before the end of the year.

Connect with CyTRAP BlogRank on Google+ or the author using: Email | Twitter | | Xing


Email is dead; long live email!

by Urs E. Gattiker on 2013/03/31 · 0 comments 2,067 views

in a dos and don'ts,social media diary

Email takes up to 28 percent of workers’ time.
Will social media make us more effective?
Here is where companies are headed next.
Keywords: Apple ID, email frequency, Facebook, Twitter, webmail, Yahoo.
CLICK - view graphic - Daily social media activity - 60 million Facebook updates, 140 million tweets just on Twitter, 188 billion email messages.In September 2011, Smartertools presented an infographic (see right) that indicated email usage in the billions versus ‘only’ millions of Facebook or Twitter actions, making the daily number of messages far highers than all status messages combined.
Eighteen months later talk of how email is dead has become progressively louder. Many believe that voice messaging, chat programs, Facebook status updates and so forth have begun to overtake email usage.
This blog post discusses the end of email or maybe better: What we need to do to lessen the flood of email.
In the meantime, join our 5,000+ subscribers and sign up for our blog – it is FREE! Get the next blog post first.

Why consumers need an email address

Services such as LinkedIn, Tumblr, Posterous, Tencent, etc. are impossible to use without an email address – as required to:

- get an Apple ID,
- join Facebook,
- use Twitter,
- upload presentations on Slideshare, or
- share your videos on YouTube, Vimeo, etc.

The above facts have not changed since 2011. However, consumers are getting increasingly concerned about overflowing inboxes.

For instance, a recent survey revealed that for every 4 out of 10 consumers, more than half of new emails come from marketers.

CLICK - email - Time and again, consumers say information overload drives them away.

Bottom line

Marketers must offer ‘opt down‘ options that allow consumers to reduce mailing frequency (e.g., weekly digest, fewer blog posts each week) to lessen churn.

In corporate settings we need to cut down the amount of emails we send and whom we copy. Less is better. How about trying to limit emails sent, such as the first 15 each work day are ‘free’, but you pay $1 into the team’s party fund for each additional email sent.

Oh, and while we are at it stop email delivery from 9:00 – 12:00 and 14:00 – 16:00 (and don’t forget to include posting to social media platforms). This will reduce interruptions and make it easier for staff to focus on tasks at hand (i.e. get your ‘real’ work done first).

Is email dying?

The folks at McKinsey believe that introducing social networking tools in your firm will cut email usage 25 to 30 percent, but will that make communications more effective?

What was once the fastest and most efficient way to communicate within companies as well as with clients is increasingly viewed as outdated and cumbersome. Email overload is certainly a challenge for corporate users. Sending and receiving about 100 emails daily suggests we do not use this tool effectively.

Marissa Mayer‘s approach has been to ban Yahoo employees working from home, which will certainly cut down on the number of emails and video conference calls needed to coordinate work on- and off-site.
CLICK - Developing strong relationships with consumers and writing strong subject lines appear to be the best ways to ensure emails are opened.
Media darling Atos claims that the zero email approach is succeeding, but is it?

As we have experienced, Atos’ internal processes are cumbersome and extremely time consuming. Put differently, ineffective use of email or social media platforms may suggest a more serious problem regarding internal processes that require streamlining.

Bottom line

Google Android mobile OS requires a Gmail address to operate, and my son’s iPod syncs with Apple’s iTunes service, which also requires an email address. And Facebook will continue to send you the next change in its privacy or advertising policy via email, trust me!

Atos may abide by the zero email policy internally, but 9 out of 10 clients will want to be able to reach Atos staff via email or other channels. And whatever you choose (with or without email), make sure you do not fritter time away by replacing one tool – email – with another that is even more of a time-sink (e.g., using an internal social media platform to discuss customer problems, etc.). Unless change means you are more productive and effective, why do it?

Good to know
Yahoo share values have risen 50 percent since Marissa Mayer took the helm in July (though half of its equity value is tied to non-core Asian investments), and with 186 million US monthly unique visitors according to comScore, they outstrip Facebook and trail Google only slightly.

Mayer recently agreed to pay US$30 million for the smartphone app Summly (1 million users = US$30 per user – the same as Facebook paid for Instagram).

Can a smartphone summarise this article in 100 words? Supposedly Summly can, so maybe it will soon summarise your email? Too bad Yahoo plans to shut down this app (though it plans to incorporate the technology)…

Article source: Email is dead; long live email!

More resources

How do you keep your email inbox empty and use texting and messaging effectively? Tips to share?


Urs E. Gattiker, Ph.D. - CyTRAP Labs - ComMetrics.

The author: This post was written by social media marketing and strategy expert Urs E. Gattiker, who also writes about issues that connect social media, strategy, ROI and compliance (click Google Scholar), and thrives on the challenge of measuring how it all affects your bottom line.

His latest book, Social Media Audit: Measure for Impact, was recently published by Springer Science Publishers; he is currently working on his next book, scheduled to appear before the end of the year.

Connect with ComMetrics on Google+ or the author using: Email | Twitter | | Xing


How good is our corporate blog?

Ranking the most influential corporate blogs. And the winner is….

Facebook ‘Likes’ predict your sexual preferences.
Does Facebook really reveal secrets we have not shared yet?
Should I worry that my Facebook ‘Likes’ will trigger an increase in my car insurance premiums?
Keywords: privacy, data mining, big data, decision making, discrimination, user rights, social media use.
CLICK - DOWNLOAD summary of study and complete paper FREE.Since their beginnings, social networks have offered opportunities for insight into users’ behaviors and personal preferences.
Now a study reveals that the things we choose to ‘like’ may reveal secrets about ourselves we may not have shared. This may include our sexuality, political leanings and even intelligence (click image to view more information and download research paper).

This research suggests that we must reflect on how much of ourselves we can safely reveal online.

By the way, sign up for our blog – it is FREE! Get the next blog post first.

Facebook, Heineken and Budweiser

Correlation is a statistical term that addresses whether two variables move together. So, if I like a lot of beer brands on Facebook, does this correlate positively with how much beer I consume? Is the relationship such that the the more beer brands I like, the more beer I consume?

Or could the correlation be negative? This would mean the more beer brands I ‘Like’ on Facebook, the less beer I drink each week or month.

Of course addressing this issue gets increasingly difficult the more variables are involved. We often try to control for a variable, by essentially eliminating its influence. Accordingly, how much your ‘Likes’ of several beer brands correlates with beer consumption may be better explained if we control for some effects.

An example would be how many hours we spend doing physical exercise each week. It seems obvious that people who do a lot of exercise generally drink less than others. In fact, we may find that while younger women love beer commercials (i.e. especially those featuring great looking guys), those that exercise more than two hours each week rarely enjoy beer. Clearly, just looking at ‘Likes’ may result in researchers making wrongful inferences about a person’s preferences and lifestyle (see my profile below – is this the ‘true’ me?).

CLICK - Facebook Likes - let us not confuse correlations with causality.

Bottom line

The study [Kosinskia, Michael, Stillwell, David, and Graepelb, Thore. (March 2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. PNAS - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America] nicely illustrates the need to seriously rethink how much data we are voluntarily sharing online.

CLICK - View - BlogRank - Social Media Shares - What we know.

Three things seem particularly important:

1. Like curly fries? You’re clever? NOT: Great to know for the 60 percent of cases where researchers were able to predict IQ based on a test of Facebook ‘Likes’, but what about the 40 percent whose ‘Likes’ predicted that somebody was gay when the person was not?

2. The way I use Facebook, LinkedIn or Twitter is not necessarily the person I am: For instance, I Liked Time magazine’s Facebook page to gain access to an application, that allowed me to generate a Time cover page with my image on it. Thus, data generated (see my image above) by my liking of this page (and also All Facebook and Magnum Ice Cream) would suggest that I am a serious and shy person. But as anyone who knows me personally will tell you, it is misleading. Forget using ‘Likes’ in the job recruitment process.

3. Why Red Bull, Heineken and Ferrari might leave Facebook: This is a very important study, because it shows that Liking your page could reveal personal secrets your fans do not want to share (e.g., you like Red Bull? – you take too many risks = time to cancel your life insurance). What if someone went on tv to announce that those that Like the Ferrari Facebook page have a lower IQ, or those Heineken fans are real lushes? A public relations nightmare waiting to happen for these firms.

Get more ComMetrics content on Google, Myspace, KPI, ROI and rankings (just click the URL to get some very interesting results).

Good to know

Facebook launched its like button in 2009, and the small thumbs-up symbol has since become ubiquitous on the social network and common across the rest of the Web, too. Facebook announced in 2012 that about 2.7 billion new likes pour out onto the Internet every day‘Likes’ endorse everything from pop stars to soda pop and luxury watches.

More resources

Source: Facebook Likes: Is this job applicant a drug addict?

Are you worried about what others could infer from your ‘Likes’? Leave a comment below.


Urs E. Gattiker, Ph.D. - CyTRAP Labs - ComMetrics.

The author: This post was written by social media marketing and strategy expert Urs E. Gattiker, who also writes about issues that connect social media with compliance, and thrives on the challenge of measuring how it all affects your bottom line.

His latest book, Social Media Audit: Measure for Impact, was recently published by Springer Science Publishers.

Connect with ComMetrics on Google+ or the author using: Email | Twitter | | Xing