ComMetrics weekly review: Curbing media freedom, Google and Sarah Palin

by Urs E. Gattiker on 2010/08/02 · 14 comments 5,644 views

in a dos and don'ts

This week’s social media DOs and DON’Ts: Social media measurement, marketing buzz tidbits, tools and other happenings we came across while surfing the internet, blogging and posting on Facebook, Identi.ca, Naijapulse or Twitter as well as LinkedIn and Xing.

Our focus includes Sarah Palin making fun of herself, Hungary curtailing bloggers’ freedomAmazon’s new strategy page, Google’s woes in China and other heavyweight brands’ trials and tribulations.

In case you missed previous weeks’ memorable moments on social media monitoring, just point your browser to:

Don’t miss the upcoming week! Sign up right now with your email to get the social media metrics insights first:

So here come the highs, lows and oddities I discovered through my various social media channels.

    Sunday and Monday

Sarah Palin may be planning to run for US president in 2012. John McCain’s former running mate is wading into the discussion over whether an Islamic study center should be allowed to build a mosque near Ground Zero of the 9/11 disaster in New York.

Image - tweet by @SarahPalinUSA - Peaceful New Yorkers, pls refute the Ground Zero mosque plan if you believe catastrophic pain caused @ Twin Towers site is too raw, too realImage - tweet by @SarahPalinUSA - Peace-seeking Muslims, pls understand, Ground Zero mosque is UNNECESSARY provocation; it stabs hearts. Pls reject it in interest of healing

America’s self-described ‘Grizzly Mom’ appeared on US television and tweeted, calling on Muslims to repudiate the plan. Her malapropism was greeted by a tide of bi-coastal derision, which she topped with “Refudiate, misunderestimate, wee-wee’d up. English is a living language. Shakespeare liked to coin new words too. Go to celebrate it!”

It was Barack Obama himself who warned people against getting all ‘wee wee’d up’ during last year’s protests against healthcare reform. The author of ‘misunderestimate’ does not need a reintroduction, does she?

    Tuesday

Today I came across some news that Hungary’s new prime minister Viktor Orban is engaged in self-styled ‘revolution’ that includes an assault on media freedom, through such measures as compulsory registration of bloggers. How will the government decide what a blogger is – anybody posting on the Web, or just those using blogging software?

I am worried about press freedom, especially since Hungary takes over the EU’s rotating presidency next year. If Viktor Orban continues to push his brand of populism curtailing free speech and democracy, we worry.

    Wednesday

Almost 16 days ago in China, only one of 13 services – Gmail – was considered fully accessbile. ‘Web search suggest’, the drop-down list of related search items, has been blocked since the end of June.

Photo-sharing site Picasa, YouTube, blogger and Google sites have been fully blocked for China’s users since March.

Image - Google and China censorship - re-routing searches via Hong Kong - how it works

Routing users to Hong Kong means Google does not censor results itself, but China’s great firewall kicks in anyway. If mainland users enter banned keywords they might lose their browser connections for at least 10 minutes.

Baidu is reaping the benefits, since its search share has risen from 58 to 70 percent while Google’s has fallen from 36 to 24 percent, further hurting Google, which has lagged behind the Nasdaq by 19 percent this year while Baidu has outperformed it by 80 percent. Apparently, having principals and conducting business accordingly has a price for everyone, even big dogs like Google.

Image - Ivy Bean - world's oldest tweeter died at 104 - her last tweet on July 4 said: going to have my lunch now will be back laterIvy Bean, the world’s oldest tweeter better known by her handle ‘IvyBean104′, died Wednesday 2010-07-28 at age 104.Her tweets ran the gamut, from the mundane to juicy gossip.She had 57,000 followers, including Sarah Brown, wife of former Prime Minister Gordon Brown. They met this year at Downing Street to talk about social networking.

    Thursday

White papers — Damning verdict on buy-out groups that have underperformed, whose motto seems to be ‘heads they win, tails you lose’.

I came across another white paper saying that private equity groups produce disappointing returns while charging their investors fat fees amid glaring conflicts of interest:

    - 2 to 8 percent (average rate) charged as annual management fee of funds raised, and
    - 20 percent ‘carried interest’ of any profits above a certain level, say 8 percent.

One study mentioned cited 110 deals in Europe between 1995 and 2005, reporting:

    - 39 percent internal rate of return, of which
    - 22 percent was accounted for by debt, and
    - 9 percent by a rising stock market

This left the private equity managers’ contribution at just 8 percent. I think I prefer pension fund managers and public money stay away, the risk is not worth it.

=> Private equity, public loss? by Peter Morris

The Private Equity Council, a US trade association which represents 13 of the biggest US buy-out groups, including Blackstone, KKR, TPG, Carlyle and Apax, responded on Tuesday by saying that the CSFI report “…has at best a tangential relationship to the facts… The 60-page text’s selective quotations of existing research and ignorance of data that rebut its conclusions do more to perpetuate the myths about the industry than to dispel them.”

=> Private Equity Council – press room

    Friday

Virtually insecure: The Article 29 Working Party, an influential group of European data regulators, feels that the current practice of sending cookies as soon as someone lands on a page must stop.

=> The Article 29 Working Party – European Union – 2/2010 opinion on online behavioral advertising - unrealistic

I agree, but it is only a first step, since I already have a way of dealing with it, for example by using the no-script plug-in for Mozilla Firefox. Unfortunately, many sites that require a cookie will not allow me to use all their features without allowing their cookie on my machine/hard-drive. They give me a choice that is not really a choice, is it?

Image - graphic - legislators & regulators are concerned that internet users have been left with too little control of how their personal information is used - how it works - what data is gathered to serve you with targeted advertising - privacy quo vadisInstead, the Article 29 Working Party should demand that users be given the opportunity to take advantage of most site content (e.g., weblogs, news sites), without accepting a cookie. Yes, Google Analytics uses a cookie to collect data on websites – German data protection regulation requires full disclosure by the site owner to visitors – but how helpful is this when a user cannot access to much of the content and services on a site without accepting the potentially intrusive bit of script?

Digital trails left by users proliferate quickly (see right). Considering that advertisers end up engaging in surveillance that is often covert, creepy and non-consensual things must change to make sure that a single visit to a site cannot tell marketers things they have no right to know.

If a single visit reveals too much to those without a right to know, why have privacy regulation at all? What is your opinion on this?

    Saturday

Amazon, maker of the Kindle eReader, is trying to write a new chapter in book publishing strategy. Just as a reminder, from January through May 2010 the US market experienced a:

    - 7 percent fall in adult mass market book sales,
    - 200 percent growth in eBook sales, and
    - 8.5 percent of the total market was eBook sales, compared to 3 percent for the same period last year.

Clearly, it seems that authors and publishers are missing an opportunity by not offering a book in digital format as well as print.

Some 764,000 public domain and self-published books were released in the US during 2009 compared with 288,000 traditional titles. This seems a vast pile of potential riches for Amazon. It substantially improved royalty rates for self-published authors to 70 percent in January 2010!

We do not take American Express here. Why, because a recent US study shows that merchants generally do not set differential prices for credit card users to recoup the costs of fees or rewards. As a result:

“…On average, each cash-using household pays US$151 to card-using households and each card-using household receives US$1,482 from cash users every year… Reducing merchant fees and card rewards would likely increase consumer welfare.”

Schu, S., Shy, O, & Stavins, J (July 2010) – Who gains and who loses from credit card payments? Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

    Sunday

Things for reflection: We have spent many hours, resources and grief on the BP oil spill. However, the true consequences for the environment may not be known for months or even years.

Moreover, the 8.84 million gallons (33.46 million liters) of dispersants used may continue to haunt us. Some scientists fear they may have a worse effect on sea life than the oil, since their use in this manner was ‘unprecedented’.

As quarterly results suffer, BP is to sell US$30 billion in assets to pay for oil spill costs, while it confirmed the departure of its chief executive Tony Hayward.

Image - graphic - how the resources have been spent to clean up the Deepwater Horizon disaster - BP oil spill - much spent, little to show for - the good, the ugly, the bad

Additional resources

Article source: ComMetrics weekly review: Curbing media freedom, Google and Sarah Palin

What is your opinion? Please share, discuss and leave a comment below.

Previous post:

Next post: