Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.

Appreciate your comment on 2010 trends – mobile communication. But these days I am a bit less worried about e-mails that we are required to back up anyway to be able to produce them in case the court goes through an e-discovery process with us.

This week, smartphone security risks are something I worry the most about.

For instance, Wednesday (2010-08-04) the EU Commission announced that it does not allow its 32,000 employees to use a Blackberry because of security concerns.
Nevertheless, the Commission has nothing against smartphones from Apple or HTC

This is suprising since Apple iPhone just had another exploit in the wild reported this week. Late last year already (i.e.2009-11-19), Germany’s Ministry of the Interior urged other gov. departments and agencies neither to use smartphones from RIM (Blackberry) nor Apple’s iPhone due to security risks.

This week (2010-08-04) it was made public that the current iOS 4.0.1 has an exploit in the wild that makes the iPod, iPhone, iPad all vulnerable to malicious PDF files.

So while I believe secure e-mail is definitely a good thing, my concern is more about the many smartphones getting left behind in taxis and possibly getting into the wrong hands. As well, workers tweeting or e-mailing on their private smartphones and their toys being hacked should worry risk managers.

I found particularly interesting the statement that the Opolis user sending an e-mail to another party:

“… decides whether the recipient may copy, print, respond to or forward a message.”

The above is interesting but everything can be copied if need be we do it the archaic way by just re-typing the text

As well, by backing up the information as the company is required by law it can still be part of the e-discovery process initiated by a court of law. u00a0All information is fully discoverable and the first place lawyers look when building a case.

Hence, if you don’t want e-mail to be used the wrong u00a0way by the recipient, the best choice seems to neither send the information by e-mail nor using Twitter, that simple.

Thanks for sharing and hope to get your next comment soon.